Single-Page Applications (SPA) vs Multi-Page Web Applications (MPA) — Which is Better?
One of the most strongly debated subjects in the web development world is the difference between SPAs and MPAs. Recently, practically everyone has gotten on the bandwagon of single-page applications. Why is it the subject of so much hype? What about conventional applications with numerous pages? Do they worsen? Thanks to these inquiries, we have a fascinating notion.
In this article, we will discuss the two primary methods for developing web applications—single-page applications (SPA) and multi-page web applications (MPA). We will explore the advantages and disadvantages of each method, the use cases where one might be preferable over the other, and best practices for implementation.
What is a Single-Page Application?
A single-page application (also known as a SPA) is a web application or website that uses a single HTML page as a shell for all web pages. SPAs have a dynamic nature of loading. During interaction with a user, they display content without needing to be fully updated since different pieces of content are downloaded automatically as requested. It is possible thanks to AJAX technology. Most links will not trigger a page reload no matter what you click there. In single-page applications, there is only one HTML page, and this one page downloads a bunch of assets, CSS, and images but typically also a lot of JavaScript. Speaking of the latter, the code will then listen to clicks on links and then re-render parts of the DOM in the loaded page whenever a user needs something.
This means a user can see the main content in a browser. Still, when scrolling or navigating to a different page, all necessary elements will be dynamically updated instead of the entire page reloading. Thanks to this, single-page applications resemble native applications except that they work in a browser.
The Internet is filled with SPA examples. Some of them you use regularly. Whenever you open your inbox messages in Gmail, read the Facebook news feed, or join a thread discussion on Twitter, you deal with single-page web apps.
SPA Pros
|
SPA Cons
|
Yojji successfully delivered the project within schedule. They demonstrated excellent project management via weekly sprint demos and promptly made adjustments based on the client's feedback. Their responsiveness and collaborative attitude were key elements of their work.
5.0
Yojji was an instrumental part of the client’s team, working closely with them to achieve the product’s success. The team was very collaborative and timely, and their performance was amazing. Additionally, their resources were experienced, professional, and enjoyable to work with.
5.0
Yojii is impressive both in quality of development work as well as their commitment. Strong focus on delivery, highly technical personnel, flexible approach that allows for rapid development. Strong processes that allow for solid controls.
5.0
We’re very happy with the way that Yojji works, which is why we’ve spent so much money and engaged them for such a long time. We treat them as employees in regard to responsibilities and expectations, and they haven’t disappointed us.
5.0
As a company, we find Yojji to be excellent development partners - we cannot recommend them more highly and will be very happy to continue working with them in the future.
5.0
They are really nice people with excellent technical backgrounds.
5.0
We used Agile project management methodology and were in contact with the team and project manager daily.
5.0
They all had a super positive outlook and were dedicated to getting the work completed to a high standard.
5.0
Yojji has delivered an accessible product with thorough consideration for the client's requirements. Users have commented on the platform's user-friendliness and speed. Moreover, the team is easy to communicate with and provides frequent updates. Their development and design skills are impressive.
5.0
