When hiring a team of developers, a product owner comes across various pricing models, each with its own benefits and drawbacks. Without a doubt, both sides have an interest in picking the most suitable and beneficial type of cooperation. Chances are, you have heard about the two widely-used software development pricing models, time-and-material and fixed price. And now you are at the crossroads: you need to decide which outsourcing agreement is better for your company. Of course, it would be so much easier if all the decisions could be made by tossing a coin, wouldn’t it? But let’s be realistic, this is the case when weighing all the pros and cons is a must. To help you make the right choice, we have prepared this informative article. Keep reading to learn everything you need to know about time-and-materials vs. fixed price patterns.
Even though a lot of companies often combine the two models creating unique agreements, we suggest that you read some general information about each to have a better understanding of what time-and-material and fixed-price contracts are.
When customers are looking for a software development cooperation partner, there are typically several questions that concerns them most:
Both the fixed price and time-and-material pricing models can give answers to each of the questions. Proceed to learn how.
Read also: Navigating the Digital Realm: Key Differences Between Websites and Web Applications
As the name implies, a fixed-price model (also known as a firm-fixed-price model) is a type of contract in which both parties, a client and a vendor, agree on the scope of work, deadlines, and amount of money required for project implementation prior to beginning the development process.
Typically, when choosing this cooperation model, customers pay either one, or several times within the agreed timeframe. Even though the scope of work is fixed, there’s a decent chance that you might need to implement some additional features along the way. It goes without saying that you might want to deal with additional expenditures and prolonged deadlines.
A time-and-material contract, as opposed to a fixed price type, offers more flexibility in terms of development time frames and the budget required. Within this billing model, a client pays for the actual scope of work that is done by a service provider. The price is formed by the amount of time a team of developers has spent on a particular project and the cost of materials used. The hourly labor rates are agreed upon by a client and a contractor beforehand. As for the payment intervals, they are also flexible and negotiated in advance.
Paying for software development isn’t the same as buying products in a grocery store. A project tends to change and grow, typically requiring more time and expenses. That’s why most customers believe a time-and-material model is better compared to a fixed price.
There is no perfect solution. Both pricing formulas have their benefits and drawbacks. Let’s have a closer look at them.
Let’s now take a quick look at what projects would become a great fit for a time and material model:
Setting a fixed price looks like a perfect option at first. However, it is not as rosy as it may seem.
To help you decide whether the fixed price pricing formula fits you, we suggest that you determine the size of your project first. Fixed-price contracts are most appropriate in the following cases:
Thus, in response to the question, "Which pricing model is better, time-and-materials vs. fixed price?" our answer is, "The T&M contract is slightly ahead of the fixed price system due to the flexibility it offers.". Nonetheless, they're both good. The fixed-price pricing model is ideal for short projects with tight deadlines and/or an MVP. On the other hand, if your project is large and complex, and you require more flexibility in selecting features, it is preferable to choose the time and material.
Yojji has experience with both fixed-price and time-and-material pricing methods. Get in touch with us to learn what model will fit your specific project.
Yojji successfully delivered the project within schedule. They demonstrated excellent project management via weekly sprint demos and promptly made adjustments based on the client's feedback. Their responsiveness and collaborative attitude were key elements of their work.
5.0
Yojji was an instrumental part of the client’s team, working closely with them to achieve the product’s success. The team was very collaborative and timely, and their performance was amazing. Additionally, their resources were experienced, professional, and enjoyable to work with.
5.0
Yojii is impressive both in quality of development work as well as their commitment. Strong focus on delivery, highly technical personnel, flexible approach that allows for rapid development. Strong processes that allow for solid controls.
5.0
We’re very happy with the way that Yojji works, which is why we’ve spent so much money and engaged them for such a long time. We treat them as employees in regard to responsibilities and expectations, and they haven’t disappointed us.
5.0
As a company, we find Yojji to be excellent development partners - we cannot recommend them more highly and will be very happy to continue working with them in the future.
5.0
They are really nice people with excellent technical backgrounds.
5.0
We used Agile project management methodology and were in contact with the team and project manager daily.
5.0
They all had a super positive outlook and were dedicated to getting the work completed to a high standard.
5.0
Yojji has delivered an accessible product with thorough consideration for the client's requirements. Users have commented on the platform's user-friendliness and speed. Moreover, the team is easy to communicate with and provides frequent updates. Their development and design skills are impressive.
5.0